Reddit's For You Feed Arrives: The Front Page of the Internet Gets an Algorithm

Oct 29, 202611 min read

On October 28, 2026, Reddit began rolling out the most consequential change to its homepage in years. The single home feed, which had long mixed posts from communities a person had joined with suggestions from communities they had not, is now split into two tabs: For You and Following. The company said the change would reach users worldwide over the following weeks, and plenty of people in the United States were already seeing the new layout before the announcement went live.

A tab is a small thing. This one is not. Reddit's personality rests on the idea that the reader builds the front page: you choose the communities, you vote on the posts, and the site's character comes out of that deliberate, topic-first curation. Handing the default entry point to a ranking system moves a piece of that editorial authority away from the person holding the phone.

What Reddit actually shipped

The definitions are simple. Following shows posts from communities a user has joined, and nothing else. For You mixes those posts with recommendations that Reddit says are tailored to a person's interests, aimed at surfacing communities and conversations they might not otherwise find.

Three behaviors matter more than the marketing:

The app opens on For You first, then remembers whichever feed was used last, so someone who switches to Following stays there on the next launch.
For You has no sort control at all. Following offers Best and New. Reddit has said that feedback asking for Home as the following feed's third sort option is being looked at.
The long-standing home feed recommendation toggle has effectively been retired for anyone in the new experience. The choice moved from an account setting to a tab.

The third point is where the argument starts. Reddit has offered a home feed recommendation switch for years, and users who disliked suggested posts could turn them off and have the setting stick. Under the new layout that switch no longer does the job, because the recommendation stream now has its own address. Reddit's own community team has framed the trade plainly: the Following tab is the way to see only your subscriptions, so the old toggle is surplus. That is a reasonable product decision, and it is not the same thing as letting someone opt out of recommendations entirely.

Getting here took a year of quiet demolition

The split did not appear out of nowhere. For a long time Reddit's home feed blended subscriptions with machine-generated suggestions, and the company ran repeated experiments with how prominently those suggestions appeared. Over the past year it has also been dismantling the sitewide feeds that once defined browsing. r/all, which showed popular posts from across the platform, was deprecated as part of what Reddit described as efforts to simplify the site and improve home feed personalization. A separate interface test pushed r/popular out of the home tab and into a menu in the top corner, a move that annoyed users who treated the swipe to popular as muscle memory. The chief executive had already made his view of that feed clear, arguing that Reddit needed something better and more relevant instead.

Each step shrank a shared destination. r/all was crude but honest: everyone saw roughly the same firehose, in roughly the same order, and the ranking did not pretend to know you. A personalized For You feed works in the opposite direction. Two people opening Reddit on the same afternoon may now share almost no posts, and neither can see what the other is being shown.

Why the company wants this

Reddit's public explanation is about discovery and participation. In its announcement the company described the new feed as a first step toward helping people find something novel and relevant - an idea, a connection, a perspective, or a new interest - and described a more human internet as something you take part in rather than sit back and watch. That is the language of a platform worried about lurkers.

The product logic underneath the language is familiar. Reddit's most engaged users always know exactly where to go. Its least engaged visitors open the app, see a feed assembled from subscriptions they barely remember choosing, and leave. Steve Huffman has said he wants casual users to be able to come back and find relevant posts, including older ones. The company has also been testing video and audio adaptations of popular posts, some drawn from threads that are years old, which only makes sense if the surface presenting them is curated rather than strictly chronological.

There is also the gravitational pull of the industry. Instagram, X, Threads and Facebook all run recommendation-driven feeds, and Reddit is now one of the last major platforms to make a ranked feed the default entry point rather than a feature buried in settings.

Two feeds, two different promises

	For You	Following
Content	Joined communities plus recommended posts from elsewhere	Only communities you have joined
Ranking	Machine-ranked, with no sort control	Best and New sorts
Default behavior	Opens first, then yields to whichever feed was used last	Sticky once chosen
Optimized for	Discovery of new communities and conversations	Control over what appears
Typical complaint	Feels imposed, hard to switch off at the account level	Can go stale for casual visitors

The distinction is not only about content. It is about who is doing the curating, and how visible that curating is. A subscription feed is legible: you can look at it and understand why every post is there. A ranked feed is opaque by design, because the ranking is a moving estimate of interest rather than a statement of fact.

Reddit has not published the details of how its recommendations are ranked. Its help documentation describes recommendations as personalized suggestions based on a person's activity and interests, and the company says it is working on ways for users to give feedback on recommended content so suggestions can be fine-tuned. Early reviewers found the results noticeably more targeted than r/all had been: a reporter testing the feed during the rollout saw suggested posts from communities they had never joined but had recently visited, sitting high in the stream.

The backlash is loud, specific, and partly being heard

The complaints arrived well before the rollout. In Reddit's own help community, threads about recommendations reappearing in the home feed drew hundreds of upvotes and hundreds of replies, with users pointing out that they had deliberately switched recommendations off years earlier and could not find a setting to switch them off again. The replies were blunt: accusations of enshittification, declarations that this would be the thing that finally pushed them off the site, and a recurring suspicion that the removal of the off switch revealed what the company already knew about how people would react.

Two things are worth separating in that reaction. One is preference: plenty of people simply want a feed they built. The other is control. Choosing Following is not the same as saying never show me recommendations, because the For You tab remains part of the product, keeps collecting signals, and is still the first thing a new or returning user encounters. Some of the loudest complaints are less about the quality of suggestions than about the disappearance of an exit.

The backlash has also produced a concrete concession. An earlier version of the experiment forgot which feed a person had selected and pushed them back to For You on every launch. The version shipping now remembers. Reddit's community team credited user feedback for the change, and it is a useful reminder that defaults are negotiable at the margins even when the overall direction is not.

What this does to communities

For a subreddit, being recommended is a different kind of event than being subscribed to. Subscription traffic arrives in a steady trickle from people who opted in. Recommendation traffic arrives in bursts, sometimes from users who have no context for the community's norms, its recurring arguments, or its standing jokes. Moderators inherit the acculturation work either way, but a ranked feed makes the bursts bigger and less predictable.

There is a subtler risk as well. Ranking systems optimize for signals that travel well across audiences, which tends to reward posts that are legible to outsiders: a clear question, a satisfying answer, a strong reaction. The texture that makes small communities worth visiting - inside references, slow-burn threads, the same six regulars arguing for a decade - is much harder to rank. None of this is unique to Reddit. It is the standard cost of moving from subscription to recommendation, and it is the cost Reddit is choosing to pay.

Reddit's graph is made of topics, not people

The comparison with TikTok is tempting but imprecise. TikTok's For You page recommends creators and videos, and its interest graph is built around individual pieces of content. Reddit's graph is built out of rooms. Its For You feed is closer to a community recommender than a creator recommender, and the failure modes differ accordingly: a bad creator recommendation wastes thirty seconds, while a bad community recommendation drops you into a room where you do not know the rules and where the regulars can tell at a glance that you do not belong.

That is the bet Reddit is making, and it is not a foolish one. A good community recommendation is stickier than a good video, because it comes with a place to return to. The question is whether the platform can make those introductions without flattening the thing that made the rooms worth entering.

Keeping the old experience, practically

Tap Following and leave it there. Reddit now remembers the selection between sessions, so the switch is a one-time action rather than a daily chore.
Accept the sorting you get. Following carries Best and New in this experience. Home as a third option is under review, but it is not currently available to everyone.
Old Reddit still exists. Sorting by best, hot, new, rising and controversial remains available at old.reddit.com or through the settings menu, though Reddit plans to cut back access for accounts that have not used it recently. If you depend on it, sign in soon rather than assuming it will wait for you.
Be deliberate about what you open. Early users noticed that suggestions tracked communities they had visited without joining, so idle curiosity now functions as a signal rather than a private detour.

What to watch next

The first thing to watch is whether the feedback tools Reddit has promised actually materialize. A For You feed that lets you tell it what you did not want is a different product from one that only learns from what you clicked. The second is the sort menu: whether the following feed regains more control over ranking, and whether the recommendation feed ever gains any. The third is format. Reddit has been converting popular posts into video and audio, including material from threads several years old, and has said it will keep experimenting with new ways to navigate the app. Those experiments are easier to justify when the surface showing them is algorithmic, which makes the For You feed an enabling condition for everything that follows.

The front page is now a hypothesis

Reddit spent two decades telling itself that its value came from what people chose to follow. The new homepage says something different: that the value also comes from what the platform can guess. Both can be true, and the split feed is an attempt to hold them side by side rather than pick one.

What will decide whether this works is not the quality of the recommendations. It is whether the control offered alongside them feels real. If Following stays one tap away and stays remembered, most people will settle into whichever feed suits them and the argument will fade into a settings preference. If For You keeps creeping back into the default position, or if the off switch keeps migrating further from reach, the frustration already visible in Reddit's help threads will become the platform's defining story rather than a footnote to it. The tab is small. The claim it makes - that a machine can find you a better room than you can find yourself - is not.

References

Discussion

0 comments

More news

Google Takes AI Mode Ads to Ten New Markets as Search Ad Growth Cools

On October 28, 2026, Google used its parent company's quarterly earnings call to make a quiet but consequential announcement: advertising inside AI Mode, the conversational layer of Search, is leaving the United States. Ads in AI Mode are now live in Australia, Canada, India, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Singapore, with Brazil, Mexico, and the United Kingdom slated for the fourth quarter. In the US, Google is adding multiturn ads that can appear inside follow-up queries during an ongoing conversation. The timing is not accidental. Alphabet reported $127.6 billion in quarterly revenue, up 25% year over year, and crossed a half-trillion-dollar annual run rate. Yet Google Search and other advertising grew 12% to $63.35 billion, down from 17% growth in the second quarter and 19% in the first. The company's shares fell sharply after the print. The message from management was essentially that AI search is growing faster than Google can monetize it, and the fix is to sell ads in more places. A STRONG QUARTER WITH A SOFT SPOT IN THE MIDDLE The headline numbers looked healthy. Consolidated operating income rose 30% to $40.6 billion, operating margin reached 31.8%, and Google Cloud revenue more than doubled to $30.7 billion on demand for AI infrastructure. First-party model APIs were processing close to 32 billion tokens per minute, more than four times the volume of a year earlier, and the Gemini app passed one billion users. Advertising told a different story. Total Google advertising revenue reached $82.0 billion, up 10.6%, with YouTube ads contributing $11.2 billion and the Google Network $7.5 billion. Search, the engine that funds most of Alphabet's ambitions, decelerated for the third consecutive quarter. Chief Business Officer Philipp Schindler attributed part of the slowdown to foreign exchange movements, which he called the single largest drag. He also pointed to category-level shifts: some Asia-Pacific retail advertisers pulled back after the European Union removed its de minimis exemption, and media and entertainment spending normalized following the FIFA World Cup. Those are cyclical explanations. Then he offered a structural one. "The strong growth in AI Mode queries had an impact because of the lower monetization we were seeing in AI Mode," Schindler told analysts. In other words, the product Google is most eager to promote generates less revenue per query than the ten blue links it is gradually replacing. WHAT GOOGLE SHIPPED, AND WHERE The rollout is documented in a Google Ads post by Shashi Thakur, VP and GM of Search Ads. Ads will carry a clear "Sponsored" label, and the company says it will keep testing new formats. The geographic list is deliberate. Beyond the familiar English-language markets of Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, it includes India, Pakistan, the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Kenya, and Nigeria, a mix of large, fast-growing mobile-first populations where conversational search may spread faster than desktop keyword search ever did. Multiturn ads are the more interesting product change. Traditional search advertising assumes a single query with a discrete intent. A conversation has a shape: someone asks about a category, reacts to an answer, narrows a shortlist, and then asks a follow-up. Multiturn ads let a sponsored placement follow the user into that follow-up rather than waiting for a new search box interaction. This builds on formats Google announced at Marketing Live in May 2026, including conversational discovery ads that respond to a user's specific question with creative assembled per query, and highlighted answers that place a sponsored recommendation inside a list of AI-generated suggestions. The through line is consistent: ads sit beside the AI answer, labeled and separate, and never alter the organic response itself. WHY LONGER QUERIES CHANGE THE MONETIZATION MATH The case for AI Mode advertising rests on query behavior. Google says queries in AI Mode run about three times longer than traditional searches. One in five AI Mode searches globally involves voice, images, or documents, and Google reports more than 50 billion visual searches per month. Longer queries carry more context. A person typing "running shoes" gives an auction a keyword. A person describing a half-marathon, a history of plantar fasciitis, a modest budget, and a preference for wide toe boxes gives an auction a brief. Schindler framed much of this as upper-funnel demand: users asking questions earlier in the purchase journey, before they have settled on a product, which Google describes as new high-value commercial intent rather than a replacement for existing intent. He added that the majority of AI Mode queries are incremental. Google also claims the formats are working. According to Schindler, click-through rates for sponsored product listings in AI Mode are already comparable to those for organic product listings, and internal research suggests users find the ads relevant. Both claims are directionally encouraging and notably imprecise. Google has not published the underlying click-through rates, has not compared them with conventional Search ads, and has not disclosed how much revenue AI Mode advertising generates. The gap between "users tolerate ads" and "advertisers get returns" is where this expansion will be judged. THE ADVERTISER SIDE OF A CONVERSATIONAL AUCTION For media buyers, the practical question is what to change. The answer is less about bidding tactics than about the inputs Google's models consume. Gemini now generates and assembles creative rather than serving a single static asset. Sparse product feeds produce weak conversational creative; complete feeds with accurate attributes, inventory, and descriptive product detail give the model better material. Landing pages matter more, not less, because a user arriving from a refined, exploratory conversation brings specific expectations that a generic page will fail to meet. And the campaign types Google points advertisers toward, AI Max and Performance Max, are the same ones that reach AI Overviews and AI Mode placements today. Google says the tools are already producing volume. Gemini models helped advertisers generate more than 1.5 billion campaign assets in the third quarter, over seven times the number a year earlier. The company also reported a 19% increase in user satisfaction after its largest update to product listing ads in a decade, with dissatisfaction falling by more than half. Telstra, cited on the call, saw a 52% increase in conversions and a 36% reduction in cost per order using AI Max to capture long-form and multilingual queries. Those numbers describe the tooling, not the new inventory. Scaling ads into ten markets is a distribution decision. Whether it produces durable revenue depends on whether advertisers can measure what a conversational placement is worth. THE COMPETITIVE CLOCK Google is not moving first. OpenAI introduced advertising in ChatGPT in India in late August 2026, partnering initially with WPP and Omnicom before opening a self-service Ads Manager, and disclosed a $1 billion annualized revenue run rate within roughly 200 days of launch, with tens of thousands of advertisers across more than 40 countries. It has since tested sponsored agents that let a user click an ad and begin a conversation with a business-sponsored assistant, and expanded visual formats and measurement partnerships. That puts a different kind of pressure on Google. Search advertising has been a keyword auction with two decades of attribution infrastructure behind it. Conversational advertising is a newer category where the pricing model, the measurement standard, and the user tolerance are all still being negotiated. Google's advantage is that its AI Mode placements plug into existing Google Ads accounts, so an advertiser already running Search campaigns can extend reach without rebuilding a measurement stack. Its disadvantage is that the same advertiser will ask why a longer, more expensive query produces less revenue than a short one. Google is also building toward agentic commerce, including the Universal Commerce Protocol that enables direct checkout across hundreds of thousands of brands. Schindler said the company is designing these experiences to preserve product discovery and consumer choice even when AI agents handle parts of the shopping process. If agents eventually complete purchases on a user's behalf, the sponsored recommendation may matter more than the click. WHAT THE EXPANSION DOES NOT SOLVE The announcement addresses coverage, not economics. Several open questions remain. First, Google has not quantified AI Mode revenue or its drag on the Search line. Analysts can see the deceleration but cannot isolate how much of it is AI Mode mix, how much is currency, and how much is category softness. That ambiguity is part of why the stock reaction was severe. Second, the near-term outlook is cautious. Finance chief Anat Ashkenazi said Google is absorbing roughly two percentage points of headwind in the fourth quarter from the base effect of accelerated Search growth in late 2025, alongside adverse currency movements. Both Search and YouTube advertising are likely to remain under year-over-year pressure. Third, the cost side is intensifying. Capital expenditure reached $51.4 billion in the quarter, and Alphabet maintained a 2026 outlook of $195 billion to $205 billion while warning that 2027 spending will rise significantly. Free cash flow turned negative at $9.07 billion, which management attributed largely to timing: TPU systems are built and stocked before revenue is recognized, and the cloud backlog now stands at $561 billion. Investors are being asked to accept a lag between spending and return. Fourth, trust remains the unresolved variable. Ads in AI-generated answers invite a specific skepticism that banner ads never faced: if a sponsored product appears inside an answer, users may wonder whether the answer itself was influenced. Google's design answer is separation and labeling. The Gemini-written explainer that accompanies the new formats is meant to make the reasoning visible. Whether that is enough to preserve confidence at scale is an empirical question, and the ten new markets are the test. WHAT TO WATCH NEXT The fourth quarter brings Brazil, Mexico, and the United Kingdom, which will say something about how the formats perform in larger, more mature ad markets with different competitive dynamics. The Q4 call should provide more detail on 2027 capital spending, and possibly the first real disclosure on how AI Mode inventory is priced and performing. For advertisers, the useful preparation is unglamorous: complete product feeds, diversified creative assets, landing pages that answer the question the user actually asked, clean first-party conversion signals, and campaigns structured to be eligible for AI surfaces rather than shielded from them. For Google, the wager is that a search experience people use more, with queries three times longer and increasingly multimodal, will eventually monetize at least as well as the one it is displacing. The company's own chief business officer has now said out loud that it does not yet. That is the honest shape of this moment. Google is not replacing search advertising with AI advertising so much as extending the same auction into a new interface and hoping the unit economics catch up before the patience of either advertisers or shareholders runs out. The expansion to ten markets is a bet that scale will do the catching up. The next two quarters will show whether the bet is working. REFERENCES * Google Ads: Ads in AI Mode Expand to New Markets * TechCrunch: Google Expands AI Search Ads Globally as Core Ad Growth Slows * Alphabet Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results

10Oct 29

Khosla Ventures leads Even Healthcare's $50M round at $300M valuation

Even Healthcare has raised $50 million in an all-equity Series B round led by Khosla Ventures, with participation from Alpha Wave. The round values the Bengaluru-based managed-care startup at $300 million, triple its valuation 18 months ago, and brings its total capital raised to more than $120 million. The funding backs a bet against how Indian hospitals make money. Hospitals in India typically earn more when patients undergo additional tests, procedures, or longer stays, even when they may not need them. Even wants to change that by focusing on patient care rather than pushing unnecessary treatments that drive up medical bills. THE SHIFT TO OWNED HOSPITALS The startup was founded in 2021 by Mayank Banerjee, Matilde Giglio, and Alessandro Ialongo. It initially relied on partner hospitals to treat its members, but Banerjee said in an interview that the startup began questioning that model after finding that patients had undergone tests or been recommended surgeries it considered unnecessary. "We think patients are getting not only a bad experience, but insurers are getting a bad economic deal. And as a result, we decided to fix it by building our own hospitals," Banerjee told TechCrunch. Even has since opened two hospitals in Bengaluru, both of which reached operational profitability, excluding depreciation, within a year of opening, Banerjee said. The startup plans to open five more hospitals in the city over the next six months, funded by the latest round. It leases hospital buildings on 20-year agreements and spends on fitting them out and buying medical equipment. The compensation model is central to the approach. Even pays its doctors fixed salaries, not tying their pay to the number of tests or surgeries they perform, though doctors can earn bonuses based on patient-reported clinical outcomes. Hospital management compensation is likewise not linked to procedures. Every employee, including doctors and hospital staff, receives equity in Even. EARLY RESULTS Most of Even's revenue comes from patients paying for treatment. The startup also generates revenue through its relationships with insurers and is working with insurer partners on a model that could compensate it for hospitalizations it helps prevent. Even says its hospitals have an unplanned readmission rate of less than 1%, compared with an industry benchmark of 8% to 15%. It claims patients spend 40% less time in the hospital and that the approach has saved insurers more than 500 million rupees (about $5.27 million). Khosla Ventures has invested in Even since its seed round in 2021. Vinod Khosla, the firm's founder, said in a prepared statement that the goal is to reward better health outcomes rather than greater use of healthcare services. "The clinical and economic results so far give us conviction that this can become an important new model for healthcare in India and beyond," he said. Jai Sajnani, a partner at Khosla Ventures, told TechCrunch that the early performance of Even's hospitals was a key reason the firm led the round. The startup still loses money. Even posted a net loss of 902 million rupees (about $9.50 million) in fiscal 2025, nearly 25% more than the previous year, on revenue of 272 million rupees (about $2.86 million), regulatory filings show. In August, it laid off about 350 employees, according to Indian startup-news website Entrackr. Banerjee acknowledged the restructuring and called it a difficult decision, saying affected employees received severance, extended health insurance, and accelerated equity vesting. Even employs about 650 people, including around 300 doctors full-time. It has about 250,000 members and has recorded more than 750,000 patient interactions since its launch in 2021. Banerjee told TechCrunch that Even could turn profitable within months if it stopped spending on expansion, but the startup is choosing to grow instead. "Right now, we're investing in growth and serving more patients," he said.

10Oct 19

Changelog as marketing: the KiteDocs pitch to indie hackers

The solo founder behind KiteDocs, a documentation hosting tool, posted on Indie Hackers this week that a changelog can do marketing for an indie product. The pitch is simple: write about your own progress, about what you know well, and readers will follow how the product grows. To prove it, the founder published their own changelog at kitedocs.com/docs/changelog, with screenshots of how it looks on desktop and mobile. The post, from October 17, frames the changelog as a low-effort content channel for founders who build in public. "It's always fascinating to read about how a product grows and develops, what founders do to make it better," wrote Aspiring Dev, the founder's name on Indie Hackers. They said they have not automated anything yet, but added that with KiteDocs it is easy to create content of almost any type: a diary, documentation, a user guide, an API reference. WHAT KITEDOCS IS KiteDocs is a platform for creating, managing, and publishing documentation online, built for product teams, startups, and enterprises. The founder says they started it because every new project brought the same problem: paid solutions were greedy, open-source tools were hard to use, and organizing docs under a folder was a nightmare. The tool handles knowledge bases, user manuals, product documentation, and playbooks. Custom domains work on every plan, and docs can be hosted on a subdomain or a subfolder. Pricing runs from a free plan with 20 pages, to Startup at $10 a month for 100 pages, Pro at $29 a month for 500 pages, and Business at $79 a month for unlimited pages. White-labeling and AI-powered search sit on the paid tiers, with AI searches described as coming soon. Non-technical users can publish through a visual editor, templates, and auto-generated navigation. A DOCUMENTATION SURVEY AS A LEAD MAGNET Three days earlier, on October 14, the same founder posted a second appeal on Indie Hackers: answer questions about how you handle documentation and get free lifetime access to the PRO plan, normally $29 a month with unlimited projects and 500 pages. The questions asked whether readers have documentation, whether it lives on a subdomain or a subfolder, which tool they use, and where they host their website. The subfolder question targets a known pain point. The founder argues that most founders put documentation on a subdomain rather than a subfolder, even though a subfolder looks more professional and helps with SEO, because subfolder setup is hard. They figured it out for Linux and shared the configuration steps, while acknowledging that not everyone runs Linux or has direct server access. The offer is a practical growth move for a solo project: free lifetime access in exchange for a detailed answer and an email address, which the founder needs to adjust account limits. The changelog post closes the loop by inviting readers to start posting their own progress and to request features KiteDocs does not have yet. Whether a changelog truly does marketing for a founder depends on whether anyone reads it. The founder's own changelog sits on the KiteDocs domain, which is also the product being marketed, so its audience is limited to people who already found the tool. Still, for a solo founder with no marketing budget, publishing progress in public is one of the few channels that costs nothing but writing time, and the tool now exists for exactly that purpose.

10Oct 18

Stay informed as a product watcher.

Market insights that help you start and grow your business.